<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Developer Dispatch</title>
	<link>http://developerdispatch.com</link>
	<description>News and notes for Macromedia Director and Flash Developers</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on New YouTube Categories by Hashini</title>
		<link>http://developerdispatch.com/new-youtube-categories.html#comment-23894</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 05:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developerdispatch.com/new-youtube-categories.html#comment-23894</guid>
					<description>Actually the 'You Tube' belongs to what category?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=postpar >Actually the &#8216;You Tube&#8217; belongs to what category?<br /><br class=pbreak>
</p><br class=pbreak>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Director 11 Is Here by Gary Rosenzweig</title>
		<link>http://developerdispatch.com/director-11-is-here.html#comment-23754</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developerdispatch.com/director-11-is-here.html#comment-23754</guid>
					<description>atom: Yes, the Flash Xtra in Director 11 supports AS3 at the same level as Flash 9.0.28 did. This was the version of Flash released with Flex 2, not Flash CS3. This means it is only missing the AS3 that pertains to Flash CS3 components. Stay away from components and you should be OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=postpar >atom: Yes, the Flash Xtra in Director 11 supports AS3 at the same level as Flash 9.0.28 did. This was the version of Flash released with Flex 2, not Flash CS3. This means it is only missing the AS3 that pertains to Flash CS3 components. Stay away from components and you should be OK.<br /><br class=pbreak>
</p><br class=pbreak>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Director 11 Is Here by atom</title>
		<link>http://developerdispatch.com/director-11-is-here.html#comment-23752</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developerdispatch.com/director-11-is-here.html#comment-23752</guid>
					<description>does director 11 really support actionscript 3? All the blogs and comments etc seem to point to the conclusion that it doesn't. I'd upgrade if it had as3 support, but without it I can't see any justification for investing in the new version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=postpar >does director 11 really support actionscript 3? All the blogs and comments etc seem to point to the conclusion that it doesn&#8217;t. I&#8217;d upgrade if it had as3 support, but without it I can&#8217;t see any justification for investing in the new version.<br /><br class=pbreak>
</p><br class=pbreak>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Director 11 Is Here by suhail</title>
		<link>http://developerdispatch.com/director-11-is-here.html#comment-23376</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developerdispatch.com/director-11-is-here.html#comment-23376</guid>
					<description>How about nested time-lines?  Director needs Flash like nested time-lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=postpar >How about nested time-lines?  Director needs Flash like nested time-lines.<br /><br class=pbreak>
</p><br class=pbreak>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shockwave 11 Implementation Tricky by 升降机</title>
		<link>http://developerdispatch.com/shockwave-11-implementation-tricky.html#comment-23212</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developerdispatch.com/shockwave-11-implementation-tricky.html#comment-23212</guid>
					<description>升降机 http://www.jiyangheli.com Sure enough the text engine change is not exactly optimal, but especially on mac and using 3-D I trade that for the performance boost compared to sw10 running in rosetta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=postpar >升降机 <a href='http://www.jiyangheli.com' rel='nofollow'>http://www.jiyangheli.com</a> Sure enough the text engine change is not exactly optimal, but especially on mac and using 3-D I trade that for the performance boost compared to sw10 running in rosetta.<br /><br class=pbreak>
</p><br class=pbreak>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
